Theo feedback của nhiều bạn học viên đi thi về thì đề này chỉ giống như một câu hỏi Speaking chủ đề animals và plants thôi. Nhưng làm sao để bài đủ dài và điểm đủ 7.0 thì các bạn không nói. Cùng IPP đến với bài viết mẫu band 7.0+ dưới đây và xem mentor tại IPP đã biến hóa đề bài Speaking thành Writing Task 2 như thế nào nhé!
- TỔNG HỢP BÀI MẪU IELTS WRITING TASK 2 BAND 7.0+ TỪ IPP
- TỔNG HỢP TỪ VỰNG “HOT” DỄ ÁP DỤNG TRONG IELTS SPEAKING VÀ WRITING
Đề bài Writing Task 2 (26/09/2020): It is suggested that primary school children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Bài viết mẫu
In the age of technological dominance, some people, quite interestingly, propose a retro teaching style for primary children: instructing them on vegetable and animal caring. From my perspective, albeit some obvious advantages, they will be eclipsed by this educational method’s considerable disadvantages.
On the bright side, lessons on vegetable and animal caring can bring certain benefits to primary students. The first rationale is that this educational approach effectively teaches them about essential life skills for self-sufficiency. Growing vegetables and raising animals are practical skills that can accompany students throughout their life. Therefore, should they learn these skills at a young age, self-sufficiency will become a simpler task for primary students upon adulthood. Furthermore, learning these skills instils a sense of responsibility among primary pupils. Taking care of vegetables and animals requires tremendous agriculture-related knowledge and efforts, which can be done by a genuine sense of responsibility from the grower. Therefore, upon the learning process, schoolchildren will be moulded in conscientious citizens for the society who readily take accountability for their works.
On the flip side, however, these merits will be significantly outweighed by the demerits, one of which is the hurdle in facility provisions for this teaching method. Agriculture-related skills call for actual live animals and fertile land areas in order for students to truly understand what is entailed in the process of vegetable and animal caring. This poses an arduous predicament to most primary schools, especially in urban areas because the above facilities are difficult to establish in city settings. What is an even more glaring drawback is the dubious application of these farming skills in real life. As the world progresses towards the technology-driven era, most students will adopt a more technology-related career orientation, which makes these skills appear to little avail for their future. Also, vegetables and livestock products are easily available; therefore, primary students will consider learning to grow vegetables and keeping animals a redundant task or even a distractor to their study.
In conclusion, although learning to grow vegetables and keep animals may seem a novel idea with certain benefits, its drawbacks are so considerable that it is worth a second thought. Therefore, these skills should only be optional at primary schools since students’ long-term personal development is still given precedence.
– retro teaching style (n): phương pháp dạy quay lại thời xưa
– albeit: mặc dù
– eclipse (v): vượt qua, toả sáng hơn
– on the bright side: về mặt tốt
– on the flip side: về mặt xấu
– accompany sb throughout one’s life: đi theo suốt cuộc đời
– instil a sense of responsibility: nâng cao tinh thần trách nhiệm
– conscientious citizen (n): công dân có ý thức trách nhiệm
– facility provision (n): xây dựng, cung cấp cơ sở vật chất
– city setting (n): môi trường thành phố, đô thị
– to little avail: có ít tác dụng
– worth a second thought: nên nghĩ lại về điều gì
– long-term personal development (n): sự phát triển cá nhân trên lâu dài
– given precedence: được ưu tiên
Chúc các bạn học tốt!