[SAMPLE WRITING] Bài mẫu IELTS chủ đề Changing Jobs

Ngày nay, thay đổi công việc, “nhảy việc” là một hiện tượng không hề xa lạ. Lý do “nhảy việc” phổ biến thường là bởi lương thưởng, chế độ đãi ngộ, hoặc đơn giản chỉ là người lao động muốn thay đổi môi trường làm việc mà thôi.

Tuy nhiên, nhiều chuyên gia cho rằng tình trạng này có tác động không tốt tới sự phát triển của bản thân người lao động, công ty và cả xã hội.

Hãy cùng IPP bàn luận sâu hơn vấn đề này qua bài mẫu IELTS chủ đề Changing Jobs dưới đây và đừng quên comment quan điểm của bạn về thực trạng này nhé!

Đề bài: Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves, the company, and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Mục lục

Phân tích đề

– Question type: Discuss both views and give your own opinion

– Keywords: change jobs, bring advantages

– Từ đồng nghĩa với các keywords:

Change (verb): switch, jump from one occupation to another
Job (noun): occupation

Advantage (noun): benefit, asset, opportunity, perk, edge

Lập dàn ý bài mẫu IELTS chủ đề Changing Jobs

Outline:

Why some people think that people should not change their jobs	Why some people think that changing jobs is good
Professional development can be done by training programs instead of changing job	Avoid suffering from dissatisfaction of the current job and have more promising career prospects (eg: earn a higher in come)
Changing jobs affects the operation of a company – it’s often costly to recruit and train new staff	A company would enjoy the benefit of having a mobile and malleable workforce

Bài mẫu IELTS chủ đề Changing Jobs

In this modern era, switching jobs now and then is no longer something unfamiliar, especially to the millennials. This present-time tendency has posed a debate of whether job-hopping or life-long employment would be more beneficial for the employees, the employers, or the public. This essay will look at both standpoints and suggest its favor for the long-term employment of one workplace.

It is understandable why someone advocates job changing. The first reason is that switching to a different job keeps employees busy and helps them develop valuable professional skills. When a person starts a new job, he is kicked out of his comfort zone and forced to learn new systems, new routines, new names, and new people’s skills. A staff who has flexibility and willingness to enter the unknown will be an asset to companies that require a mobile and malleable workforce. Moreover, it is difficult to significantly increase the annual salary while staying at the same company because a wage raise is usually calculated as a percentage of the base salary. Therefore, employees often switch between jobs to enjoy such financial gain.

However, there are more sound reasons to believe that aiming to stay at the same job career-long seems to be a more holistic solution. Firstly, while I acknowledge a major downside of a one-workplace career is stagnation, this issue can be solved by training programs offered either internally or externally. This means remaining at the same job can still secure one’s professional development. Secondly, a company may operate more sustainably if it can keep the turnover rate minimal. This comes down to the fact that a firm appears to suffer from significant financial loss if their staff leave too often, as they would have to pay more for recruiting and training processes. Also, failing to maintain loyal personnel would affect its reputation, leading to more difficulty in attracting talented workers and maintaining a strong workforce, which is a key factor for the healthy development of an organization.

To conclude, it is persuasive that encouraging people to stay at the same job would have more gains than losses at all levels rather than doing the other way around. Nonetheless, an employee should feel free to consider a shift in occupation if it is more suitable for their situation.